"The Hall of Fame is for the immortals of the game—Ted Williams, Babe Ruth, Walter Johnson…"
You hear people say things like this when discussing the Hall of Fame credentials for players like Tim Raines, Alan Trammell, or Larry Walker. Everyone agrees they were good players. But some people simply believe that the Hall of Fame should be reserved for players of a much higher caliber.
The only thing is… it’s not. And it hasn't been since the 1930s.
Thanks to the Hall of wWAR, we now have a list of which Hall of Famers actually deserve to be there. Currently, 63 of the 208 players in the Hall of Fame (30.3%) didn’t deserve to be inducted (and deserve to be replaced by better players).
And yes—for the first few years of the Hall's existence, it was incredibly exclusive. Through 1944, all fourteen members of the Hall of Fame were deserving. These were elite players. The thing is, that was the last time the Hall of Fame actually lived up to this image of exclusivity.
In 1945, everything changed. The Writers weren't inducting players fast enough, so an Old Timers Committee (precursor to the Veterans Committee) was established. The committee inducted nine players in the first year. Dan Brouthers, Fred Clarke, Jimmy Collins, Ed Delahanty, and King Kelly deserved it. Hughie Jennings and Jim O'Rourke are controversial selections, but they still rate as deserving by wWAR. Hugh Duffy and Roger Bresnahan, however, became the first players to be inducted who didn't deserve it.
And that was only the beginning.
In 1946, Duffy and Bresnahan were joined by Jack Chesbro, Johnny Evers, Joe Tinker, Clark Griffith, and Tommy Freakin' McCarthy. In 1948, the Writers themselves made their first mistakes—Herb Pennock and Pie Traynor. That brought the percentage of deserving Hall of Famers (let's call it the "deserving percentage", or DP) below 80% for the first time (79.1%).
In all, the 100% hit rate of the 1930s gave way to a 70% hit rate in the 1940s. In the 1950s, 17 of the 21 inductees deserved it (81%), keeping the Hall's DP around 80%.
In the 1960s, just 61.5% of inductees (16 of 26) deserved it. By the end of the decade, just 75.3% of all Hall of Famers deserved to be there. And then the 1970s happened.
Just 50% of players inducted in the 1970s were deserving. Fifty percent. The Writers did a good job—13 of 14 deserved it (only Ralph Kiner rates as undeserving by wWAR, and he's very close and one I'd likely keep enshrined). Out of 22 Veterans inductees, just five deserved it. Five. 1970 to 1975 was a particularly rough stretch. The Hall's DP dropped from 74.0% to 68.6%.
The 1980s weren't much better. Just 62.1% of the 29 inductees were deserving. The Hall's DP hit an all-time low (66.9%) in 1987 following the induction of Catfish Hunter. After Red Schoendienst's 1989 induction, the Hall closed out the decade with a DP of 67.1%.
So, that's a thirty year stretch where just 57.1% of inductees deserved it. You want to know what's happened since then?
Since 1990, 50 players have been inducted—36 by the Writers and 14 by the Veterans. The Writers' hit rate is 86% while the Veterans come in a 57.1%. That's a "deserving percentage" of 78.0% over 22 years.
The quality of the Hall of Fame is getting a lot better. Barry Larkin's induction brought the overall "deserving percentage" up to 69.7%. The last time it was that high was 1973.
The quality of the Hall of Fame is better than it has been in a very, very long time.
Jeff Bagwell, Tim Raines, Alan Trammell, Edgar Martinez, Larry Walker, Mark McGwire, and Rafael Palmeiro are all currently on the ballot and would raise the Hall's DP. If all of them went in, we'd be up to 70.2%. Heck, throw Jack Morris and Lee Smith in there and we're still slightly improving over the current Hall.
In addition to those seven deserving players carrying over to next year's ballot, there are fifty-six other players who would raise the Hall's DP. These players range from 19th century stars like Deacon White and Ross Barnes to deadball era stars like Bill Dahlen and Sherry Magee to 1960s stars like Ken Boyer and Bill Freehan to underrated modern stars like Orel Hershiser and Dave Stieb.
Of course, this all depends on how much you believe in wWAR. I've always been a fan of the Hall of Merit and the Halls of wWAR and Merit have a ton of overlap. I'm inclined to trust them over the "real" Hall of Fame.
2 recs | 4 comments
"The quality of the Hall of Fame is getting a lot better. Barry Larkin's induction brought the overall "deserving percentage" up to 69.7%. The last time it was that high was 1973."
Here’s to hoping that trend continues.
J-Doug - January 10, 2012
I'm sure you've already thought of this
but I don’t think it’s completely fair to retroactively determine how deserving candidates from the early years were since the standards were different then. Applying modern standards to old picks I’d definitely agree that Duffy and Bresnahan should be out, but maybe at the time the line was intended to be right below them? Or you could make the argument that none of the first Old Timers’ picks deserved it because the HoF really was intended to be reserved for legends.
I’m not saying I agree with that and I’d be all for kicking the clearly unqualified players out, I just don’t think we can judge whether they were right or wrong.
Other than that, great stuff as always.
Lewie Pollis - January 10, 2012
Right, this is obviously using methods that were not available at the time.
I mean, at the time Pie Traynor probably DID deserve it compared with other third basemen. But a billion third basemen have come up after him that were better. So, it is a tricky situation.
All I’m intending to do here is show that there’s no way keeping guys like Trammell out helps keep the Hall of Fame “exclusive”.
adarowski - January 10, 2012
What a remarkably disingenuous line
considering the exceptionally arbitrary nature of wWAR.
azruavatar - January 11, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Beyond the Box Score to post a comment.